This is a summary of a research article originally published in the Journal of Urology. The PROSPER study involved men who had a type of advanced prostate cancer   called   non-metastatic   castration-resistant   prostate   cancer   (nmCRPC).   In   patients   with   nmCRPC,   their   prostate   cancer   keeps   growing even after traditional hormone treatments. In these patients, rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels suggest that cancer is active but CT and bone scans show that it has not spread to other parts of the body. Everyone in this study received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) either with the medicine enzalutamide or a placebo. Enzalutamide is a medicine that can slow or stop androgens, such as testosterone, from making prostate cancer grow. The  main  results  of  the  PROSPER  study  showed  that  patients  with  nmCRPC  treated  with  enzalutamide  and  ADT  lived  longer than patients treated with placebo and ADT. In  this  study,  researchers  wanted  to  know  if  the  findings  were  different  depending  on  how  much  patients’  PSA  level  declined after enzalutamide treatment. Researchers also wanted to know if this made a difference in how long patients lived without the cancer spreading to other parts of their bodyThis Plain Language Summary of Publication article published in Future Oncology looks at prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. This summary describes a study that involved men who had a type of advanced prostate cancer called non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). In these participants, rising PSA levels suggest that the cancer is active but scans show that it has not spread to other parts of the body. Researchers found that participants with a large decline in PSA level after treatment with the medication enzalutamide were more likely to live longer without their cancer spreading.

Read the article here.

The original article on which this summary is based is called ‘Nadir Prostate-specific Antigen as an Independent Predictor of Survival Outcomes: A Post Hoc Analysis of the PROSPER Randomized Clinical Trial’. It was published in The Journal of Urology.

Read the original article here.